|
Essential Oils |
Bella Mira Essential Oil Supplements
Essential Oil Information and Use
|
Chemical Free |
Chemical Free Body Care Products
Chemical Free Cleaning Products
|
Gluten Free |
Gluten Free Living and Recipes
|
Important Information |
Detoxification and Digestion Products
Save Your Computer Free Protection
|
Great Products |
|
FREE Wellness Tests |
Hormone Balance Test New Improved
|
Contact Us |
(918) 640-2973
Our Shopping Cart Is:
Free Samples w/$100 Order.
Is the Cause of Cancer a Common Fungus?
Dr. Tullio Simoncini www.cancerfungus.com
My idea is that cancer doesn't depend on mysterious causes (genetic,
immunological or auto-immunological, as the official oncology proposes), but it
results from a simple fungal infection whose destroying power in the deep
tissues is actually underestimated.
The present work is based on the conviction, supported by many years of
observations, comparisons and experiences, that the necessary and sufficient
cause of the tumor is to be sought in the vast world of the fungi, the most
adaptable, aggressive and evolved
micro-organisms known in nature.
I have tried many times to explain this theory to leading institutions involved
in cancer issues (the Ministry of Health, the Italian Medical Oncological
Association, etc.), elaborating on my thinking, but I have been brushed aside
because of the impossibility of
setting my idea in a conventional context. A different, international audience
represents the possibility of sharing a view about health which differs from
what is widely accepted by today's medical community, either officially or from
the sidelines.
There is an opposition between the allopathic and the Hippocratic medical ideal.
The position that I promote represents instead a meeting point of these two
conceptions of health, since from the conceptual point of view it sublimates and
adds value to both, while
highlighting how they both are victims of a common conformist language.
The hypothesis of a fungal aetiology in chronic-degenerative illness, able to
connect the ethical qualities of the individual with the development of specific
pathologies, reconciles the two orientations (allopathic and holistic) of
medicine. The hypothesis is a strong candidate for being that missing element of
psychosomatics that was sought but never found by one of the fathers of
psychosomatics, Viktor von Weiszäcker.
In considering the biological dimensions of the fungi, for instance, it is
possible to compare the different degrees of pathogenicity in relation to the
condition of organs, tissues and cells of a guest organism, which in turn also
and especially depend on the
behavior of the individual.
Each time the recuperative abilities of a known psycho-physical structure are
exceeded, there is an inevitable exposure, even considering possible accidental
co-founders, to the naggression—even at the smallest dimensions—of those
external agents that otherwise would be harmless. In the presence of an
indubitable connection between patient morale and disease, it is no longer
legitimate to separate the two domains (allopathic and naturopathic) which are
both indispensable for improving the health of individuals.
Flaws in mainstream theories on cancer causation
When facing the most pressing contemporary medical problem, cancer, the first
thing to do is to admit that we still do not know its real cause. However
treated in different ways by both official and alternative medicine, cancer has
an aura of mystery that still exists
around its real generative process.
The attempt to overcome the present impasse must therefore and necessarily go
through two separate phases: a critical one that exposes the present limitations
of oncology, and a onstructive one capable of proposing a therapeutic system
based on a new theoretical point of departure. In agreement with the most recent
formulation of scientific philosophy, which suggests a counter-inductive
approach where it is impossible to find a solution with the conceptual tools
that are commonly accepted, 1 only one logical formulation emerges: to r e f u s
e the oncological principle which assumes that cancer is generated by a
cellular reproductive anomaly.
According to this hypothesis based on years of scientific and clinical research,
the cause of cancer is infection by a common fungus,
Candida albicans. The good news is that it can be treated with a powerful
antifungal agent that can't be patented.
However, if the fundamental hypothesis of cellular reproductive anomaly is
questioned, it becomes clear that all the theories based
on this hypothesis are inevitably flawed.
It follows that both an auto-immunological process, in which the body's defense
mechanisms against external agents turn their
destructive capacity against internal constituents of the body, and an anomaly
of the genetic structure implicated in the development
of auto-destruction are inevitably disqualified.
Moreover, the common attempt to construct theories about multiple causes that
have an oncogenic effect on cellular reproduction sometimes seems like a
concealing screen, behind which there is nothing but a wall. These theories
propose endless causes that are more or less associated with each other; and
this means in reality that no valid causes are found. The invocation in
turn of smoking, alcohol, toxic substances, diet, stress, psychological factors,
etc., without a properly defined context,
causes confusion and resignation, and creates even more mystification around a
disease which may turn out to be simpler
than it is depicted to be.
As background information, it is important to review the picture of presumed
genetic influences in the development of cancer processes as they are depicted
by molecular biologists. These are the scientists who perform research on
infinitesimally small cellular mechanisms, but who in real life never see a
patient. All present medical systems are based on this research, and thus,
unfortunately, all therapies currently performed.
The main hypothesis of a genetic neoplastic causality is essentially reduced to
the fact that the structures and the mechanism in charge of normal reproductive
cellular activity become, for undefined reasons, capable of an autonomous
behavior that is disjointed from the overall tissular economy. The genes that
normally have a positive role in cellular reproduction are, then, imprecisely
referred to as "protooncogenes"; those that inhibit cellular reproduction are
called "suppressor genes" or "recessive oncogenes". Both endogenous
(never demonstrated) and exogenous cellular factors—that is, those carcinogenic
elements that are usually invoked—are held responsible for the neoplastic
degeneration of the tissues...
From a very superficial analysis of the presumed oncological picture, however,
it seems to be clear how the assertion of all this unstoppable genetic
hyperactivity can do nothing more that unveil the abysmal stupidity that is at
the basis of this way of conceiving
things. All those who work in the field do nothing but repeat the stale litany
of reproductive cellular anomalies on a genetic basis.
It is better to look for new horizons and conceptual instruments that are
capable of unearthing a real and unique neoplastic aetiology.
Back to taxonomy
In order to find the possible carcinogenic ens morbi on the horizon of
microbiology, it appears useful to return to the basic taxonomical concepts of
biology where we can see, incidentally, the existence of a noticeable amount of
indecision and indetermination.
Already in the last century, a German biologist, Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919),
departing from the Linnaeian concept that makes
for two great kingdoms of living things (vegetable and animal), denounced the
difficulties of categorizing all those microscopic
organisms which, because of their characteristics and properties, could not be
attributed to either the vegetable or the animal kingdom. For these organisms,
he proposed a third kingdom, Protista (protists).
"This vast and complex world includes a range of entities beginning with those
that have sub-cellular structure—existing at the limits of life—such as viroids
and viruses, moving through the mycoplasms to, finally, organisms of greater
organization: bacteria, Actinomycetes, Myxomycetes, fungi, protozoa and perhaps
even some microscopic algae."
The common element of these organisms is the feeding system, which,
being implemented (with very few exceptions) by direct absorption of soluble
organic compounds, differentiates them both from animals and vegetables. Animals
also feed as above, but
especially by ingesting solid organic materials that are then transformed
through the digestive process. Vegetables, by utilizing mineral compounds and
light energy, are capable of feeding by synthesizing the organic substances.
The contemporary tendency of biologists is once again to pick up, though in a
more sophisticated way, the concept of the third kingdom. One goes even further,
however, arguing that within that kingdom, fungi must be classified in a
distinct category.
O. Verona says that if we put multicellular organisms provided with photosynthetic capabilities (plants) in the first kingdom and the organisms not provided with photosynthetic pigmentation (animals) in the second kingdom—and organisms from both these kingdoms are made of cells provided with a distinct nucleus (eukaryotes)—and, furthermore, if we put in another kingdom (protists), those monocellular organisms that have no chlorophyll and have cells that are without a distinct nucleus (prokaryotes), the fungi can well have their own kingdom because of the absence of photosynthetic pigmentation, the ability to be monocellular and multicellular, and, finally, their possession of a distinct nucleus.
Additionally, fungi possess a property that is strange when compared to all
other micro-organisms: the ability to have a basic microscopic structure (hypha)
with a simultaneous tendency to grow to remarkable dimensions (up to several
kilograms), keeping unchanged the capacity to adapt and reproduce at any size.
From this point of view, therefore, fungi cannot be considered true organisms,
but cellular aggregates sui generis with an organismic behavior, since each cell
maintains its survival and reproductive potential intact regardless of the
structure in which it exists. It is therefore clear how difficult it is to
identify all the biological processes in such complex living realities. In fact,
even today, there are huge voids and taxonomical approximations in mycology.
Fungi characteristics
It is worthwhile to examine more deeply this strange world, with such peculiar
characteristics, and try to highlight those elements that somehow may be
pertinent to the problems of oncology.
1) Fungi are heterotrophic organisms and therefore need, as far as nitrogen and
carbon are concerned, pre-formed compounds. Of
these compounds, simple carbohydrates, for example monosaccharides (glucose,
fructose and mannose), are among the most utilized sugars. This means that
fungi, during their life cycle, depend on other living beings which must be
exploited in different degrees for their feeding. This occurs both in a
saprophytic way (that is, by feeding on organic waste) and in a parasitic way
(that is, by attacking the tissue of the host directly).
2 ) Fungi show a great variety of reproductive manifestations (sexual, asexual,
gemmation; these manifestations can often be observed simultaneously in the same
mycete), combined with a great morphostructural variety of organs. All of this
is directed toward the end of spore formation, to which the continuity and
propagation of the species is entrusted.
3 ) In mycology, it is often possible to observe a particular phenomenon called
h e t e r o k a r y o n, characterized by the coexistence of normal and mutant
nuclei in cells that have undergone a hyphal fusion.
Nowadays, phytopathologists are quite worried about the creation of individuals
that are genetically quite different even from the parents. This difference has
taken place by means of those reproductive cycles, which are called parasexual.
The indiscriminate use of phytopharmaceuticals has in fact often determined
mutations of the nuclei of many parasitic fungi with the consequent creation of
heterokaryon—and this is sometimes particularly virulent in its pathogenicity.
4 ) In the parasitic dimension, fungi can develop from the hyphas more or less
beak shaped, specialized structures that allow the penetration of the host.
5) The production of spores can be so abundant as to include always, at every
cycle, tens, hundreds and even thousands of millions of elements that can be
dispersed at a remarkable distance from the point of origin ( a small
movement is sufficient, for example, to implement immediate diffusion).
6 ) Spores have an immense resistance to external aggression, for they are
capable of staying dormant in adverse conditions for many years while preserving
unaltered their regenerative potentialities.
7) The development coefficient of the hyphal apexes after the germination is
extremely fast (100 microns per minute under ideal
conditions) with ramification capacity, thus with the appearance of a new apex
region that in some cases is in the neighborhood
of 40–60 seconds.
8) The shape of the fungus is never defined, for it is imposed by the
environment in which the fungus develops. It is possible to observe, for
example, the same mycelium in the simple isolated hyphas status in a liquid
environment or in the form of aggregates
that are increasingly solid and compact, up to the formation of
pseudoparenchymas and of filaments and mycelial strings.
9 ) By the same token, it is possible to observe in different fungi the same
shape whenever they must adapt to the same
environment (this is called dimorphism). The partial or total substitution of
nourishing substances induces frequent mutations in fungi, and this is further
proof of their high adaptability to any substrata.
10) When the nutritional conditions are precarious, many fungi react with hyphal
fusion (among nearby fungi) which allows them to explore the available material
more easily, using more complete physiological processes. This property, which
substitutes co-operation for competition, makes them distinct from any other
micro-organism, and for this reason Buller calls them social organisms.
11) When a cell gets old or becomes damaged (e.g., by a toxic substance or by a
pharmaceutical), many fungi whose intercellular
septums are provided with a pore react by implementing a defense process called
protoplasmic flux, through which they transfer the
nucleus and cytoplasm of the damaged cell into a healthy one, thus conserving
unaltered all their biological potential.
1 2 ) The phenomena regulating the development of hyphal ramification are
unknown to date. They consist of either a rhythmic development or in the
appearance of sectors which, though they originate from the hyphal system, are
self -regulating ,that is, independent of the regulating action and behavior of
the rest of the colony.
13) Fungi are capable of implementing an infinite number of modifications to
their own metabolism in order to overcome the defense
mechanism of the host. These modifications are implemented through plasmatic and
biochemical actions as well as by a volumetric increase (hypertrophy) and
numerical hyperplasy of the cells that have been attacked
1 4 ) Fungi are so aggressive as to attack not only plants, animal tissue, food
supplies and other fungi, but even protozoa, amoebas and nematodes. Fungi hunt
nematodes, for example, with peculiar hyphal modifications that constitute real
mycelial criss-cross, viscose or ring traps that immobilize the worms. In some
cases, the aggressive power of the fungus is so great as to allow it— with only
a cellular ring made up of three unit—to tighten its grip, capture and kill its
prey within a short time, notwithstanding the desperate struggling of the prey.
From the short notations above, it therefore seems fair to dedicate greater
attention to the world of fungi, especially considering the fact that biologists
and microbiologists constantly highlight large deficiencies and voids in all
their descriptions and interpretations of fungi's shapes, physiologies and
reproductions.
So the fungus, which is the most powerful and the most organized
micro-organism known, seems to be an extremely logical candidate as a cause of
neoplastic proliferation.
Imperfect fungi (so called because of the lack of knowledge and understanding of
their biological processes) deserve particular attention, since their essential
prerogative sits in their fermentative capacity.
The greatest disease of mankind may therefore hide within a small cluster of
pathogenic fungi, and may after all be located with just some simple deductions
able to close the circle and provide the solution.
Fungi can well have their own kingdom because of the absence of photosynthetic
pigmentation, the ability to be monocellular and multicellular and, finally,
their possession of a distinct nucleus.
Candida albicans: a necessary and sufficient cause of cancer
Considering that among the human parasite species the Dermatophytes and
Sporotrichum demonstrate an excessively specific morbidity, and that experience
shows that Actinomycetes, Toluropsis and Histoplasma rarely enter the context of
pathology, the Candida albicans fungus clearly emerges as the sole candidate for
tumor proliferation.
If we stop for a second and reflect on its characteristics, we can observe many
analogies with neoplastic disease. The most evident are:
1) ubiquitous attachment—no organ or tissue is spared;
2) the constant absence of hyperpyrexia;
3) sporadic and indirect involvement of the differential tissues;
4) invasiveness that is almost exclusively
of the focal type;
5) progressive debilitation;
6) refractivity to any type of treatment;
7) proliferation facilitated by multiplicity
of indifferent co-founders;
8) Symptomatological basic configuration with structure tending to the chronic.
Therefore, an exceptionally high and diversified pathogenic potentiality exists
in this mycete of just a few microns in size, which, even though it cannot be
traced with the present experimental instruments, cannot be neglected from the
clinical point of view.
Certainly, its present nosological classification cannot be satisfactory
because, if we do not keep the possibly endless parasitic configurations in
mind, that classification is too simplistic and constraining.
We therefore have to hypothesize that Candida, in the moment it is
attacked by the immunological system of the host or by a conventional
anti-mycotic treatment, does not react in the usual, predicted way but defends
itself by transforming itself into ever smaller and non-differentiated elements
that maintain their fecundity intact to the point of hiding their presence both
to the host organism and to possible diagnostic investigations.
Candida's behavior may be considered to be almost elastic. When favorable
conditions exist, Candida thrives on an epithelium; as soon as the tissue
reaction is engaged, it massively transforms itself into a form that is less
productive but impervious
to attack: the spore. If, then, continuous subepithelial solutions take place,
coupled with a greater area ctivity in that very moment, the spore gets deeper
into the lower connective tissue in such an impervious state that colonization
is irreversible.
In fact, Candida takes advantage of a structural interchangeability,
utilizing it according to the difficulties, e.g., in feeding, to overcome its
biological niche. In this way, Candida is free to expand to maturation in the
soil, air, water, vegetation, etc.—that is, wherever there is no antibody
reaction. In the epithelium, instead, it takes a mixed form, which is reduced to
the sole spore component when it penetrates the lower epithelial levels, where
it tends to expand again in the presence of conditions of tissular area
activity.
The initial mandatory step of an in-depth research endeavor would be to
understand if and in which dimensions the spore transcends, what mechanisms it
engages to hide itself or, again, to preserve its parasitic characteristic, or
if it has available a neutral quiescent position which is difficult or even
impossible to detect by the immunological system.
Unfortunately, today we do not have the appropriate means, either theoretical or
technical, to answer these and similar questions, so the only valid suggestions
can come solely from clinical observation and experience. While not providing
immediate solutions, these sources can at least stimulate further questions.
Assuming that Candida albicans is the agent responsible for tumor development, a
targeted therapy would take into account not just its static and macroscopic
manifestations but even the ultramicroscopic ones, especially in their dynamic
valiancy, that is, the reproductive. It is very probable that the targets to
attack are the fungi's dimensional transition points in order to perform a
decontamination with such a scope as to include the whole spectrum of the
biological expression— parasitic, vegetative, sporal and even ultra dimensional
and, to the limit, viral.
If we stop at the most evident phenomena, we risk administering salves and
unguents forever (in the case of dermatomycosis or in psoriasis), or clumsily
attacking (with surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy) enigmatic tumoral masses
with the sole result of facilitating their propagation, which is already
heightened in the mycelial forms.
Why, one may ask, should we assume a different and heightened activity of
Candida albicans, since it has been abundantly described in its pathological
manifestations? The answer lies in the fact that it has been studied only in a
pathogenic context, that is, only in relation to the epithelial tissues. In
reality, Candida possesses an aggressive valiancy that is diversified in
function in the target tissue. It is just in the connective or in the connective
environment, in fact, and not in the differentiated tissues, that C a n d i d a
may find conditions favorable to an unlimited expansion. This emerges if we stop
and reflect for a moment on the main function of connective tissue, which is to
convey and supply nourishing substances to the cells of the whole organism. This
is to be considered as an environment external to the more differentiated cells
such as nervous, muscular, etc. It is in this context, in fact, that the
alimentary competition takes place.
On the one hand, we have the organism's cellular elements trying to defeat all
forms of invasion; on the other hand, we have fungal cells trying to absorb
ever-growing quantities of nourishing substances, for they have to obey the
species' biological imperative to form ever larger and diffused masses and
colonies. From the combination of various factors pertinent to both the host and
the aggressor, it is possible to hypothesize the evolution of a candidosis.
First stage: Integer epitheliums, absence of the debilitating factors.
Candida can only exist as a saprophyte.... among the human parasite species, the
Candida albicans fungus clearly emerges as the sole candidate for tumor
proliferation [cancer].
Second stage: Non-integer epitheliums (erosions, abrasions, etc.),
absence of stage debilitating factors, unusual transitory conditions (acidosis,
metabolic disorder, and microbial disorder). Candida expands superficially
(classic mycosis, both exogenous and endogenous).
Third stage: Non-integer epitheliums, presence of debilitating factors
(toxic, stage radiant, traumatic, neuropsychic, etc.). Candida goes deeper into
the subepithelial levels, from which it can be carried to the whole organism
through the blood and lymph (intimate mycosis).
Stages one and two are the most studied and understood, while stage three,
though it has been described in its morphological diversity, is reduced to a
silent form of saprophytism. This is not acceptable from a logical point of
view, because no one can demonstrate the harmlessness of the fungal cells in the
deepest parts of the organism.
In fact, the assumption that C a n d i d a can behave in the same saprophytic
manner that is observed on integer epitheliums when it has successfully
penetrated the lower levels is at least risky, because the assumption would have
to be sustained by concepts that are totally aleatory (i.e., dependent on
chance).
In fact, we are asked not only to accept a priori that the connective
environment is (a) not suitable to nourish the Candida, but also at the same
time to accept (b) the omnipotence of the body's defense system towards an
organic structure that is invasive but that then becomes vulnerable once lodged
in the deeper tissues.
As for point (a), it is difficult to imagine that a micro-organism so able to
adapt itself to any substrata cannot find elements to support itself in the
human organic substance; by the same token, it seems risky to hypothesize that
the human organism's defense system is totally efficient at every moment of its
existence.
As for point (b), the assumption that there is a tendency to a state of
quiescence and vulnerability in the case of a pathogenic agent such as
fungus—the most invasive and aggressive microorganism existing in nature—seems
to carry a whiff of the irresponsible.
It is therefore urgent, on the basis of the abovementioned considerations, to
recognize the hazardous nature of such a pathogenic agent which is capable of
easily taking the most various biological configurations, both biochemical and
structural, regardless of the conditions of the host organism. The fungal
expansion gradient in fact becomes steeper as the tissue that is the host of the
mycotic invasion becomes less eutrophic and thus less reactive.
Benign tumors
To that end, it seems useful to consider briefly the "benign tumor" nosological
entity. This is an issue that always appears in general pathology but is brushed
aside most of the time too easily, and it is overlooked because it usually
doesn't create either problems or worries. It constitutes one of those
underestimated grey areas seldom subjected to rational, fresh consideration.
If the benign tumor, however, is not considered a fully fledged tumor, it would
be advantageous, for clarity, to categorize it in an appropriate nosological
scheme.
If it is thought that, instead, it fully belongs to neoplastic pathology, then
it is necessary to consider its non-invasive character and consequently to
consider the reasons for this.
It is in fact evident how in this second scenario, the thesis based on a
presumed predisposition of the organism to autophagocytosis,
having to admit an expressive graduation, would stumble into such additional
difficulties such as to become extremely improbable.
By contrast, in the fungal scenario, the mystery of why there are benign and
malignant tumors is exhaustively solved, since
they can be recognized as having the same aetiological genesis.
The benignity or malignancy of a cancer in fact depends on the capability of
tissular reaction of a specific organ expressing itself ultimately in the
ability to encyst fungal cells and to prevent them from developing in
ever-larger colonies. This can be achieved more easily where the ratio between
differentiated cells and connective tissue is in favor of the former.
Situated between the impervious noble tissues, then, and the defenseless
connective tissues, the differentiated connective structures (the glandular
structures in particular) represent that medium term which is only somewhat
vulnerable to attack because of an ability to offer a certain type of defense.
And it is in these conditions that benign tumors are formed; that is, where the
glandular connective tissue is successful in forming hypertrophic and
hyperplasic cellular embankments against the parasites. In the stomach and in
the lung, instead, since there are no specific glandular units, the target
organ, provided with a small defensive capability, is at the mercy of the
invader.
Furthermore, it is worth mentioning how several types of intimate fungal
invasion do not determine the appearance of malignant or benign tumors but a
type of particular benign tumor (specific degenerative alterations), as is the
case with some organs or apparatuses that do not have peculiar glandular
structures but nevertheless are attacked in their connective tissue, although in
a limited way.
In fact, if we consider multiple sclerosis, SLA, psoriasis, nodular
panarthritis, etc., the possible development of the fungus in a
three-dimensional sense is actually limited by the anatomic configuration of the
invaded tissues, so that only a longitudinal expansion is allowed.
Going back to the precondition of a reactivity that is necessary for neoplastic
development in a specific individual, it is permissible to affirm how in the
human body each external or internal element that determines a reduction of
well-being in an organism, organ or tissue possesses oncogenic potentiality.
This is not so much because of an intrinsic damaging capability as much as a
generic property of favoring the fungal (that is, tumoral) flourishing.
Then the causal network so much invoked in contemporary oncology, which involves
toxic, genetic, immunological, psychological, geographical, moral, social and
other factors, finds a correct classification only in a mycotic infectious
perspective where the arithmetical and diachronic summation of harmful elements
works as a co-factor to the external aggression .
The benignity or malignancy of a cancer depends on the capability of tissular
reaction of a specific organ expressing itself ultimately in the ability to
encyst fungal cells and to prevent them from developing in ever-larger colonies.
Conventional treatments vs antifungal therapy
With the theoretical basis of the tumor/fungus equivalency demonstrated, it is
clear how this interpretative key offers a long series of questions concerning
contemporary therapies, both oncological (used without reference indexes) and
anti-mycotic
(utilized only at a superficial level).
Which path is best to walk today, then, when faced with a cancer patient, since
the conventional oncological treatment, not being aetiological, can only
occasionally have positive effects and most of the time produces damage?
In the fungal perspective, in fact, the effectiveness of surgery is noticeably
reduced because of the extreme diffusibility and invasiveness characteristic of
a mycelial conglomerate. Surgery to solve the problem is therefore tied to the
case; that is, to conditions in which one has the luck to be able to remove the
entire colony completely (which is often possible in the presence of a
sufficient encystment, but only where benign tumors are concerned).
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy produce almost exclusively negative effects, both
for their specific ineffectiveness and for their high toxicity and harmfulness
to the tissues, which in the last analysis favors mycotic aggressiveness.
By contrast, an antifungal, anti-tumor-specific therapy would take into account
the importance of the connective tissue together with the reproductive
complexity of fungi. Only by attacking the fungi across the spectrum of all its
forms, at points where it is most vulnerable from the nutritional point of view,
would it be possible to hope to eradicate them from the human organism.
The first step to take, therefore, would be to reinforce the cancer patient with
generic reconstituent measures (nutrition, tonics, regulation of rhythms and
vital functions) that are able to enhance the general defenses of the organism.
Concerning the possibility of having available pharmaceutical cures, which
unfortunately do not exist today, it seems useful, in the attempt to find an
antifungal substance that is quite diffusible and therefore effective, to
consider the extreme sensitivity of Candida towards sodium bicarbonate (i.e., in
the oral candidosis of breastfed babies). This is consistent with the fact that
Candida has an accentuated ability to reproduce in an acid environment.
Theoretically, therefore, if treatments could be found that put the fungus in
direct contact with high sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) concentrations, we should
be able to see a regression of the tumoral masses.
And this is what happens in many types of tumor, such as colon and liver—and
especially stomach and lung, the former susceptible to regression just because
of its "external" anatomic position, and the latter because of the high
diffusibility of sodium bicarbonate in the bronchial system and for its high
responsiveness to general reconstituent measures.
By applying a similar therapeutic approach, it has been possible in many
patients to achieve complete remission of the
symptomatology and normalization of the instrumental data.
It is important to emphasize that these cases are just an example of what could
be a new way of perceiving the complexity of
medical problems, especially in oncology. [Reports of seven cases of patients,
several of whom have been documented for 10 years following sodium bicarbonate
treatment, are summarized in the complete article at the web page http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/simoncini-writes.html.]
Critical considerations
It seems appropriate to analyze, in a critical and self-critical spirit, what
may emerge in neoplastic pathology that is new and concrete. If we closely
observe the proposed therapeutic approach, it is possible to see that,
independently of its real effectiveness, it has value as an innovative theory.
First, it challenges the present methodology and especially its assumptions.
Second, it offers a concrete alternative proposal to a mountain of conjectures
and postures that sound authoritative but are too generic and therefore
ineffective .
The identification of one tumoral cause, even with all the possible general
provisos, would represent a step forward that is indispensable for escaping that
passivity determined by a lack of results, and which is responsible for medical
behaviors that are based too much on faith and not enough on real confidence.
Given, therefore, that an unconventional medical approach can benefit some
patients better—from any point of view—than the official treatments, and since
valuable results can be demonstrated, this should stimulate us to pursue further
research while avoiding patronizing postures that are both limiting and
non-productive.
We can therefore discuss whether or not sodium bicarbonate is the real reason
for the recoveries or if, instead, those recoveries are due to the interaction
of a number of conditions that have been created, the results of unidentified
neuropsychical factors, or maybe the results of something totally unknown.
What is beyond question, however, is the fact that a certain number of people,
by not following conventional methods, have been able to go back to normality
without suffering and without mutilation .
The message of this experience is therefore a call to search for those solutions
that are in accord with the simple Hippocratic obligation to man's "well-being";
that is, we must be stimulated to a critical evaluation of our contemporary
oncological therapies which indubitably can guarantee suffering. When we group
together both malignant tumors that are occasionally or never healed (such as
lung and stomach) and tumors that border with benignity (such as the majority of
thyroid and prostatic tumors, etc.) or put them together with those that have an
autonomous positive outcome notwithstanding chemotherapy (i.e., infantile
leukemia)—all of this appears to be devious and misleading, having only the
purpose of forging a consensus that would otherwise be impossible to obtain
with intellectually ethical behavior.
The fact that modern medicine not only cannot offer sufficient interpretative
criteria but even uses dangerous methodologies that
are also harmful and meaningless—even if carried out with good faith—is
something which must push us all to search for humane
and logical alternatives. At the same time, it is necessary to carefully,
open-mindedly and logically consider any theory or point of view that is dared
to be advanced in the battle against that monstrous and inhuman yoke that is the
tumor.
To this end, a note of acknowledgement is to go to all those who are aware of
the harmfulness of conventional therapeutic methods ... if treatments could be
found that put the fungus in direct contact with high sodium bicarbonate
concentrations, we should be able to see a regression of the tumoral masses. and
constantly try to find alternative solutions. People like Di Bella, Govallo and
others, although guilty of utilizing the same inauspicious principles of
official medicine (thus showing an excessively conformist mindset), are actually
using common sense by trying to relieve the suffering of cancer patients through
the use of painless methodologies, and in some cases are able to achieve
remissions, even though they're in the dark about the real causes of cancer.
In an alternative perspective, then, it would be necessary to conceive a new
approach to experimentation in the oncological field, setting epidemiological,
aetiological, pathogenic, clinical and therapeutic research in line with a
renewed microbiology and mycology that would probably drive us to the conclusion
already illustrated: that is, the tumor is a fungus—Candida albicans.
The possible discovery that not only tumors but also the majority of chronic
degenerative disease could be reconciled to mycotic causality would represent a
qualitative quantum leap, which, by revolutionizing medical thinking, could
greatly improve life expectancy and quality of life. Such reconciliation might
include a wider spectrum of fungal parasites (for example, in diseases of the
connective tissues, multiple sclerosis, psoriasis, some epileptic forms,
diabetes type 2, etc.).
In closing, considering that the world of fungi—those most complex and
aggressive micro-organisms—has been bypassed and left unobserved for far too
long, the hope of this work is to promote awareness of the hazards of these
micro-organisms so that medical
resources can be channeled not up blind alleys but towards the real enemies of
the human organism: external infectious agents.
Addendum: A Note on Cancer Treatment
The implications from my hypothesis that cancer is a fungus which can be
eradicated with sodium bicarbonate are that:
1) eighty years of genetic study and application has been for nothing,
especially considering that the genetic theory of cancer has never been
demonstrated;
2) the loss of millions, if not billions, of lives with all the suffering has
been for nothing;
3) the billions of dollars spent on chemotherapy medicine, radiotherapy, etc.
has been for nothing;
4) the recognition and prizes given to eminent researchers and professors has
been for nothing;
5) the oncologist could be replaced by the family doctor; and
6) the pharmaceutical industry will incur tremendous financial losses (sodium
bicarbonate is inexpensive and impossible to patent).
My methods have cured people for 20 years. Many of my patients recovered
completely from cancer, even in cases where official oncology had given up. The
best way to try to eliminate a tumor is to bring it into contact with sodium
bicarbonate, as closely as possible, i.e., using oral administration for the
digestive tract, an enema for the rectum, douching for the vagina and uterus,
intravenous injection for the lung and the brain, and inhalation for the upper
airways. Breasts, lymph nodes and subcutaneous lumps can be treated with local
perfusions. The internal organs can be treated with sodium bicarbonate by
locating suitable catheters in the arteries (of the liver, pancreas, prostate
and limbs) or in the cavities (of the pleura or peritoneum). (Note that sodium
bicarbonate should not be used as a cancer preventive.)
It is important to treat each type of cancer with the right dosage. For
phleboclysis (drip infusion), 500 cc given in a series of intervals—5% strength
on one day and 8.4% the next—is required, depending on the patient's weight and
condition; the stronger dose may perhaps be needed in cases of lung and brain
cancers according to the tumor type (primary or metastatic) and size. For
external administrations, it is enough to taste if the solution is salty.
Sometimes it is judicious to combine different administrations.
For each treatment, take into consideration that tumor colonies regress between
the third and fourth day and collapse between the fourth and fifth, so a six-day
administration is sufficient. A complete, effective cycle is made up of six
treatment days on and six days off, repeated four times. The most important side
effects of this care system are thirst and weakness.
For skin cancers (melanoma, epithelioma, etc.), a 7% iodine tincture should be
spread on the affected area once a day, 20–30 times consecutively in one
sitting, with the aim of producing a number of layers of crust. If, after one
month of treatment, the first crust is gone and the skin is not completely
healed, then the treatment should be continued in the same manner until the
second crust forms, heals and then comes loose without any assistance. (The
procedure is also applicable for treating psoriasis.) After this treatment, the
cancer will be gone and stay away forever.
For more information, see "Protocol Treatments with sodium
biocarbonate solutions" at http://www.curenaturalicancro.
com/cancer-therapy-simoncini-protocol.html and FAQ sections at
http://www.curenaturalicancro.com.