|
Home
Page

Bella Mira Essential Oil
Supplements
Bella Mira Magnetic Hair Care
Bella Mira Skin Care
Essential Oil Information and Use
Express Order Form
Essential Oil
Singles
Essential Oil
Blends
Essential Oil
Kits
Essential Oil Supplies
Chemical Free Body Care Products
Laundry Balls
Gluten Free Living and Recipes
Gluten Free Products
VIBRANT HEALTH PRODUCTS

Thyroid 101
Fibromyalgia 101
PAIN Relief and Information
Detoxification and Digestion Products
Pet Place
Save Your Computer Free Protection
Kelp, Ear Candles and More
Woman's World
CD's DVD's and Books
3-D Screensavers
Hormone Balance Test New
Improved
Thyroid Function Test
Internal Toxicity Test

Gift Certificates
Link Exchange/Banners


Our
Shopping Cart Is:



& FAQ

Free Samples w/$150 Order (when available)


| |
Natural birth control well-received, study says 4-10-08
Using beads to keep track of fertility was effective,
inexpensive option
NEW YORK - A "natural family planning method" in which women use a set of
beads to keep track of their fertile days is effective and widely acceptable to
women and their partners, according to a new study conducted at 14 sites in six
countries.
"I'm really convinced that this is a method that needs to be part of an informed
choice approach to family planning," Dr. Victoria Jennings, director of the
Georgetown University Institute for Reproductive Health in Washington, DC, told
Reuters Health. "Women have lots of options and they need to be aware of this
one."
Jennings and her colleagues developed the Standard Days Method (SDM), in which
women with menstrual cycles between 26 to 32 days long are instructed that they
may become pregnant if they have sex on days 8 to 19 of their cycle. Women using
the SDM can use a set of beads the Georgetown team designed, known as CycleBeads,
to keep track of their fertile days, and may abstain from sex on those days if
they don't want to get pregnant.
In the current study, Rebecka I. Lundgren of Georgetown and colleagues from the
Population Reference Bureau in Washington, DC, and the London School of Hygiene
and Tropical Medicine conducted a "real world" test of the method.
Tested by more than 1,600 women
Family planning groups, health ministries and community development
organizations introduced SDM at 14 different sites in Latin America, Africa and
Asia. A total of 1,646 women who chose to try the SDM were recruited into the
study.
Age, education, and past use of modern contraceptives varied widely among the
sites. The study participants typically abstained or used condoms during the
fertile days of their cycle.
There were 14.1 pregnancies for every 100 women per year of use of the method,
which was comparable to the 12 pregnancies per 100 woman years found in a 2002
clinical trial of the method. The main reason women got pregnant, the
researchers found, was that couples "knowingly took the risk" of having
unprotected sex on fertile days.
While people often associate natural family planning techniques like the "rhythm
method" with religious beliefs, most women in the study who chose to use the SDM
said they did so because it was side-effect free, didn't affect women's health
and was inexpensive, the researchers note in the March issue of Contraception.
Men didn't mind method
Jennings said that the degree of involvement with the method among women's
partners in the study was surprising. "Men reported being very satisfied with
the method, and a significant number of men reported being involved in some way
in helping their partner to use this method," she noted, for example reminding a
woman to move the marker on the beads or making sure to have condoms available
on a woman's fertile days.
Ninety percent of both men and women in the study said they felt the SDM was
easy to use, and that they would recommend it to others.
"Here in the US most of the women who choose to use it appear to be previous
users of hormonal methods who have basically decided that they want to do
something natural now," Jennings noted. When used properly, she added, the SDM
is nearly as effective as the Pill and more effective than the diaphragm or
condoms.
|