|
Home
Page
Bella Mira Essential Oil
Supplements
Organic Carrier Oils
Diffusers
Essential Oil Information and Use
Express Order Form
Essential Oil
Singles
Essential Oil
Blends
Essential Oil
Kits
Essential Oil Supplies
Gluten Free Living and Recipes
Thyroid 101
Fibromyalgia 101
PAIN Relief and Information
Pet Place
Save Your Computer Free Protection
CD's DVD's and Books
3-D Screensavers
Hormone Balance Test New
Improved
Thyroid Function Test
Internal Toxicity Test

Gift Certificates
Link Exchange/Banners
.gif)

Our
Shopping Cart Is:

& FAQ



| |
Judge OKs $24M for pets hurt by tainted food 10-14-08
Owners have until Nov. 24 to file claims; checks could arrive
next year
A federal judge Tuesday approved a $24 million settlement for owners of dogs
and cats who were sickened or died after eating pet food contaminated with an
industrial chemical.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Noel Hillman clears the way for U.S. pet
owners with claims to start receiving checks next year. A Canadian judge has
scheduled a hearing for Nov. 3 to determine whether the settlement can also
apply in that nation.
Under the deal, pet owners have until Nov. 24 to file claims.
The settlement is to compensate owners for many expenses, including: the cost
of the food, medical and burial expenses for their animals, the value of the
animals or the cost of replacement pets, checkups for animals who ate the food
but did not get sick, replacing carpets ruined by sick pets, and time the owners
took off work to seek treatment for their animals.
Sherrie R. Savett, a lead lawyer for plaintiffs in the case, has said she
believes that more than 1,500 animals in the U.S. died after eating the food
last year.
10,000-plus file claims
Lawyers said that so far, more than 10,000 people have filed claims. Of the
claims analyzed so far, the average is nearly $1,500. But the lawyers say that
average could drop when an administrator reviews the expenses to make sure they
are reasonable.
If money is left over after all pet owners have been paid, it would go to
animal-welfare charities. If the fund does not cover all the claims, pet owners
would receive something less than 100 percent of their economic losses.
A few dozen pet owners formally objected to the settlement — some of them
because they believe it should also compensate them for pain and suffering due
to the loss of their pets. Some wrote letters to the judge describing their
animals, who died after eating contaminated food, as best friends who should not
be regarded as mere possessions.
But lawyers in the case say the law is not on the side of their deeply felt
sentiments, and a hearing on the settlement Tuesday focused on more routine
legal matters.
The case began in March 2007, when dogs and cats began mysteriously getting
sick. It turned out that the common thread was pet food produced under nearly
200 labels — much of it by Streetsville, Ontario-based Menu Foods Income Fund.
Food tainted with melamine
Most of the food turned out to contain Chinese-made wheat gluten laced with
melamine, an industrial chemical. Since then, the nitrogen-rich chemical used to
make plastics and fertilizers have been found in a variety of food products in
China. Authorities there have issued guidelines limiting acceptable levels of
the chemical in food.
Hundreds of pet owners sued over the contamination. Just over a year after the
pets began getting sick, lawyers for pet food manufacturers, stores that sold
it, and pet owners had worked out the settlement, which would be in addition to
about $8 million already paid by the companies to pet owners.
At Tuesday's hearing, the judge also considered the issue of payment for the
lawyers in the case. Fifty-five firms did work for plaintiffs. Savett told the
judge that the lead firms alone had put in work worth more than $5 million.
Savett, who has spent more than two decades working on class-action lawsuits,
said pet owners would do well under the settlement — even without damages for
their suffering.
If the case had been allowed to go to trial, she said, the defendants might have
tried to make each plaintiff prove that a pet had eaten the contaminated food
and that it was not some other cause that killed or sickened the animal.
"There is a risk that people would not have gotten anything at all," she said.
Comment:
This scare makes us understand why it is so important to feed our pets a corn
and wheat free diet. Every time there are pet food tainting scares the
ingredients are always corn and wheat. This is not just a problem in pet foods
either. Just another reason why a grain free diet is best for humans and their
pets alike.
|