Home Page  Forum

Current Health News Archives

Essential Oils

Bella Mira Essential Oil Supplements

Bella Mira Magnetic Hair Care

Bella Mira Skin Care

Essential Oil Information and Use

Essential Oil Singles

Essential Oil Blends

Essential Oil Kits

Essential Oil Supplies

Chemical Free

Chemical Free Body Care Products

Chemical Free Cleaning Products

Gluten Free

Gluten Free Living and Recipes

Gluten Free Products

Important Information

Thyroid 101

Fibromyalgia 101

PAIN Relief and Information

Detoxification and Digestion Products

Pet Place

CD's DVD's and Books

Save Your Computer Free Protection

Great Products

Kelp, Ear Candles and More

Woman's World

CD's DVD's and Books

3-D Screensavers

FREE Wellness Tests

Hormone Balance Test New Improved

Thyroid Function Test

Internal Toxicity Test

Gift Certificates

Link Exchange/Banners

Contact Us

 (918) 640-2973

Our Shopping Cart Is:

& FAQ

Free Samples w/$100 Order.

 

Wireless chips may endanger patients in hospital 6-24-08

Radio frequency identification (RFID) tags are commonly used on medical devices for tracking purposes. But the tags can interfere with critical care medical devices such as pacemakers and may endanger patients, according to a study published Tuesday in the journal of the American Medical Association.

The study showed that RFID tags may interfere with the function of certain medical devices and could potentially lead to serious harm to a patient aided with a critical care device.

"The study highlights the fact that we really need our healthcare system to understand technologies are always double-edged," Dr. Donald Berwick, of Harvard University's School of Public Health was quoted by ABC News as explaining.

"They can bring benefit but usually also have concurrent hazards, so we need to be sophisticated and wise about these technologies and how we use them."

For the study, researchers at Vrije University in Amsterdam tested 41 critical care medical devices including pacemakers, ventilators, IV pumps, and anesthesia machines. They moved RFID tags around each device at different distances to see if there is any interference with the device.

Of 123 tests, 34 tests showed interference with the device near which a RFID tag was moved.   Of these 34 instances, doctors rated 22 as hazardous.

In all test settings, no patients were present or involved. Berwick said he would not recommend that the use of RFID tags be discontinued, but suggested that immediate further study should be initiated to examine if this type of interference would endanger patients who use a device which is susceptible for the interference from a RFID tag.