|
Essential Oils |
Bella Mira Essential Oil Supplements
Essential Oil Information and Use
|
Chemical Free |
Chemical Free Body Care Products
|
Gluten Free |
Gluten Free Living and Recipes
|
Important Information |
Detoxification and Digestion Products
Save Your Computer Free Protection
|
Great Products |
|
FREE Wellness Tests |
Hormone Balance Test New Improved
|
Contact Us |
Our Shopping Cart Is:
Free Samples w/$150 Order (when available)
USDA to define ‘natural’ personal care products 7-7-08
A California lawsuit highlights the problems consumers have faced in the
confusing regulatory terrain of organic and natural personal care products.
Consumers have had only piecemeal and incomplete regulation to guide them. But
government agencies and other organizations are taking steps to improve public
safety.
As one maker of personal products said, "It's a year of reckoning for the
industry."
On May 29, state Attorney General Jerry Brown filed a lawsuit under Proposition
65 against four companies with "natural" personal care product lines containing
the chemical 1,4-dioxane, a known carcinogen.
The four companies named in the lawsuit are Avalon Natural Products, Beaumont
Products Inc., NutriBiotic and Whole Foods Market California Inc.
The state's actions, however, will be limited by the scope of Proposition 65,
which does not directly cover organic and natural products but does require that
warnings be placed on products containing carcinogens.
At the national level, the U.S. Department of Agriculture is working on a
definition of "natural products" to be used in future standards, said USDA
National Organic Program spokesman Billy Cox. It does not certify natural
products.
The department's National Organic Program certifies organically produced
cosmetics and body care products but on a voluntary basis.
The Food and Drug Administration can take action against cosmetic companies that
make false or misleading claims on product labels, but it does not define or
regulate "organic" or "natural" cosmetics, nor does it test any cosmetics before
they go to market.
In the private sector, the nonprofit Natural Products Association launched a
certification program May 1. The voluntary program will certify products as
natural if they contain at least 95 percent ingredients from renewable resources
found in nature, with no petroleum compounds.
"Organic products aren't necessarily inherently safer than non-organics," said
David Bronner, president of Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps. "But if they're certified
and not making bogus claims, it does guarantee they can't use a lot of
problematic petrochemicals."
Natural product claims don't really mean anything since there are no
regulations, Bronner said.
The Escondido company's personal care products are compliant with the USDA
program.
" 'Natural' is a funny word," Bronner said. "The product still doesn't grow on a
tree."
Ronnie Cummins of the watchdog group Organic Consumer Association agrees.
"There's a nominal meaning to 'natural,' " Cummins said. "It certainly doesn't
connote it's safer than conventional products."
Consumers may not know the difference between natural and organic, but they will
pay a premium for both types of goods, according to Cummins.
"They should get their money's worth, not petroleum-based products disguised as
natural," Cummins said.
Deputy Attorney General Susan Fiering said the state hopes companies will agree
to reformulate or strip out the 1,4-dioxane from their products.